Doubts were raised over key evidence in a rape case. A pair of blood-stained underwear was the only physical evidence presented by the prosecution, but its significance was questioned.

The testimony of the alleged victim was also scrutinized, with several inconsistencies found. These inconsistencies, along with doubts over the physical evidence, led to a decision.

The Court of Appeal ultimately acquitted a former actor of the charges, citing the inconsistencies and doubts. Further details of the case are available from the original report.